Google
 
Web www.scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com

The boy who knew too much: a child prodigy

This is the true story of scientific child prodigy, and former baby genius, Ainan Celeste Cawley, written by his father. It is the true story, too, of his gifted brothers and of all the Cawley family. I write also of child prodigy and genius in general: what it is, and how it is so often neglected in the modern world. As a society, we so often fail those we should most hope to see succeed: our gifted children and the gifted adults they become. Site Copyright: Valentine Cawley, 2006 +

Friday, February 24, 2012

Barack Obama and Mitt Romney's tax plans.

Barack Obama and Mitt Romney have both promised tax cuts, if elected, that sound delicious to the voter’s ears. Barack Obama has said he will cut corporate taxes from 35% to 28%. He has also said he will maintain the Bush era tax cuts for most voters, and raise taxes on those earning 250,000 dollars a year and more. Mitt Romney on the other hand, rather more adventurously, has promised to cut all individual tax rates by 20% - and to cut corporation tax to just 25%. Now, my question is: are these two men sane?

There is a profound problem with the idea that broad ranging tax cuts are possible in America, at this time. America, as the whole world knows, is deeply in debt. Indeed, its debt is so large that it would take many years to conquer it, with wide ranging tax INCREASES, and cuts to all government funded public services. It is simple not possible to cut taxes, as offered by Obama and Romney, and maintain existing services. Should either of these tax plans be implemented then one of two things would happen: the American debt burden would grow rapidly – or all publicly funded services would have to be dramatically cut, to balance the books. Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are making seductive promises to the electorate, which simply cannot be kept, without destroying America as a nation. Now, there is the real meaning of these promises: both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney would be prepared to destroy America, just to get elected.

America needs to cut public spending, and/or raise taxes, if it is to reduce its debt burden. This is the unavoidable truth. Barack Obama and Mitt Romney clearly believe that the American electorate is dumb...and perhaps they are right. They are certainly banking on the dumbness of the American people to get them elected, since what they are promising cannot be delivered without imperilling the United States itself.

I am hoping that the American electorate is bright enough to see the essential problem with promising significant tax cuts in an era of unprecedented national debt. It would be rash in the extreme to do so. Promising to do so, can only mean one thing – that the politician would do anything, absolutely anything, including bankrupt his own nation, just to get elected. What the American people need to do is pause for a while and reflect on whether they really want a politician like that, at the helm of their nation. By making such promises, both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, reveal themselves to be dangerously unelectable. Should they be elected, the safety and long term security of the United States would be imperilled (if they keep their promises and are able to make them happen).

If any candidate wishes to promise significant tax cuts, they should also identify which public services they are going to cut, and by how much. The full truth needs to be declared. It is meaningless for a candidate to promise massive tax cuts, without also explaining how the budget will be balanced. It would also be very revealing if they do not intend to balance the budget, for that would be a plan to increase America’s debt burden...and that, now, at over 15 trillion dollars, is beyond the point at which it would be safe to increase it further.

So, remember this: Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, by declaring such fantastic, even delusional tax cutting plans, are declaring that they would bankrupt America, if it meant they could get elected again. I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t want either of them in charge of my country. Would you?

Posted by Valentine Cawley

(If you would like to support my continued writing of this blog and my ongoing campaign to raise awareness about giftedness and all issues pertaining to it, please donate, by clicking on the gold button to the left of the page.

To read about my fundraising campaign, please go to: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2011/01/fundraising-drive-in-support-of-my.html and here: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2011/01/fundraising-drive-first-donation.html

If you would like to read any of our scientific research papers, there are links to some of them, here: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2011/02/research-papers-by-valentine-cawley-and.html

If you would like to see an online summary of my academic achievements to date, please go here: http://www.getcited.org/mbrz/11136175To learn more of Ainan Celeste Cawley, 10, or his gifted brothers, Fintan, 7 and Tiarnan, 5, please go to: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2006/10/scientific-child-prodigy-guide.html

I also write of gifted education, child prodigy, child genius, adult genius, savant, megasavant, HELP University College, the Irish, the Malays, Singapore, Malaysia, IQ, intelligence and creativity.

There is a review of my blog, on the respected The Kindle Report here:http://thekindlereport.blogspot.com/2010/09/boy-who-knew-too-much-child-prodigy.html

Please have a read, if you would like a critic's view of this blog. Thanks.

You can get my blog on your Kindle, for easy reading, wherever you are, by going to: http://www.amazon.com/Boy-Who-Knew-Too-Much/dp/B0042P5LEE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&m=AG56TWVU5XWC2&s=digital-text&qid=1284603792&sr=8-1

Please let all your fellow Kindlers know about my blog availability - and if you know my blog well enough, please be so kind as to write a thoughtful review of what you like about it. Thanks.

My Internet Movie Database listing is at:http://imdb.com/name/nm3438598/

Ainan's IMDB listing is at http://imdb.com/name/nm3305973/

Syahidah's IMDB listing is at http://imdb.com/name/nm3463926/

Our editing, proofreading and copywriting company, Genghis Can, is athttp://www.genghiscan.com/This blog is copyright Valentine Cawley. Unauthorized duplication is prohibited. Use only with permission. Thank you.)

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
posted by Valentine Cawley @ 10:03 PM  0 comments

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Singapore is No.1.

"Singapore is No. 1", is a phrase I have heard so many times since coming to Singapore. When I first heard it, I thought it was absurd and couldn't understand why anyone would ever say it...now, however, I see it as something else: it is what those in power would like the Singaporean people to believe.

Do Singaporeans believe that Singapore is No. 1? Well, it seems that the conditioning is working and that they do, in fact, believe this mantra, at least in some cases.

The other day, I was talking to an intelligent Singaporean about recent changes in how an international survey of University standing is done. I mentioned that in previous surveys that Singapore's Universities had done relatively well - because the measures only took the quantity of research papers published into account. I told him, however, that now the new measures took QUALITY of research into account as well, by including a measure of citations per paper (the number of times other researchers reference the paper).

"How well do you think Singapore's Universities did with the new measure?"

"They were No.1?", he half asked, half stated.

"No. They did rather badly...they have fallen dramatically in the rankings. You see Singapore produces a lot of research, but it is cited less often, than research elsewhere. The quality is not there."

The intelligent Singaporean in question went very quiet. He didn't know what to say. His deep seated belief that "Singapore is No.1", had just been confronted by an undeniable truth: Singapore's research quality was nowhere near "No.1". He didn't address the issue but, after a long pause, changed the topic and guided the conversation elsewhere. I didn't press the issue, or revisit it: I had learnt enough from his instinctive belief that Singapore should be No.1.

Singapore is a society filled with people who always like to win. They fight each other lifelong to do so. This is termed the "kiasu" attitude: a fear of losing. The idea that "Singapore is No.1" is a kind of cultural delusion that Singapore has somehow "won", against the whole world. The whole thing is very strange. Many Singaporeans seem to really believe that Singapore is somehow the top of the global heap in all respects. At least, it is not hard to find one, who will utter the famed "Singapore is No.1", in all kinds of situations.

The truth is, of course, that Singapore is doing OK in many respects. It has done quite a few things well. It has created an efficient, stable, relatively prosperous society. That is true. However, there are just as many things that it is not doing well (and I am not going to list them, lest I be accused of being too critical). Singapore is not a society without problems or flaws. It is most certainly not "No.1" in all things, or even in anything. I think the idea that "Singapore is No.1" is a dangerous one. It is an idea that leads to complacency, that leads to an attitude that "we don't need to change because we are the best already"...well, it just isn't true. Like all societies, there are many things that could be improved. Like most societies, there are other places which are better, in any respect you care to examine. Yet, the overall package, in Singapore, is relatively good. It would be truer to say not that "Singapore is No.1", but that "Singapore is doing OK..." Perhaps then, Singapore would actually have a chance to BECOME No.1 in some things...because there would be the awareness that improvement was necessary and possible. As it is, the mass delusion that "Singapore is No.1" creates the mass conviction that nothing needs to change, for all is perfect already. In other words, the propaganda that "Singapore is No.1" dooms Singapore to be mediocre, for it deprives any drive to improve of any real motivation.

So, give Singapore a chance to get better...and stop saying it is "No.1" already.

(If you would like to learn more of Ainan Celeste Cawley, a scientific child prodigy, aged eight years and seven months, or his gifted brothers, Fintan, five years exactly, and Tiarnan, twenty-eight months, please go to:http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2006/10/scientific-child-prodigy-guide.html I also write of gifted education, IQ, intelligence, the Irish, the Malays, Singapore, College, University, Chemistry, Science, genetics, left-handedness, precocity, child prodigy, child genius, baby genius, adult genius, savant, wunderkind, wonderkind, genio, гений ребенок prodigy, genie, μεγαλοφυία θαύμα παιδιών, bambino, kind.

We are the founders of Genghis Can, a copywriting, editing and proofreading agency, that handles all kinds of work, including technical and scientific material. If you need such services, or know someone who does, please go to: http://www.genghiscan.com/ Thanks.

IMDB is the Internet Movie Database for film and tv professionals.If you would like to look at my IMDb listing for which another fifteen credits are to be uploaded, (which will probably take several months before they are accepted) please go to: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3438598/ As I write, the listing is new and brief - however, by the time you read this it might have a dozen or a score of credits...so please do take a look. My son, Ainan Celeste Cawley, also has an IMDb listing. His is found at: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3305973/ My wife, Syahidah Osman Cawley, has a listing as well. Hers is found at: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3463926/

This blog is copyright Valentine Cawley. Unauthorized duplication prohibited. Use Only with Permission. Thank you.)

Labels: , , ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
posted by Valentine Cawley @ 11:58 PM  7 comments

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape