On the acceptance of difference

Some societies are more accepting of the "different" among them, than others. One of the poorest, in this respect, seems to be Russia.

A couple of days ago, I bumped into a Russian friend who is married to a Singaporean. She told me of many things, but what struck me were her reasons for leaving Russia. She is Caucasian, so these reasons may not have applied to her...but that she felt uncomfortable about the situation was clear. In Russia, you are punished if you are different. This punishment begins at bullying and ends at murder. If, for instance, you are smart, at school, you will be bullied, in Russia, on a daily basis, simply for being different in this respect. If you are Asian, you might very well be killed.

My friend told me of one case she knew of, in Russia, in which a Korean family, consisting of a mother, father and ten year old daughter, were set upon by Russians, and beaten to death. Even the ten year old girl was killed. The reason for their murder was just that they were Asian.

Now, clearly, Russia is an extreme example. This tendency, of Russians, to pick on the outsiders in their midst, can only weaken the country and lead to a diminished nation. Russia is a country that cannot benefit from the input of non-Caucasian foreigners, for instance...it would simply be too dangerous for such people to consider living there. Thus, the Russian talent pool is narrowed and impoverished - and the whole of Russia suffers from it.

However, there are other countries, in which outsiders are not accepted. To some degree most countries are guilty of this, though perhaps with a less extreme response than the Russian one. In all cases, the country is weakened by its refusal to accept diversity: with a variety of different people of different backgrounds, come different capabilities and that can only be to the good of a nation.

My hope is that the Russians mature and come to accept outsiders in their midst - and that other countries with similar attitudes also grow up a bit. It does no-one any good, to pick on anyone. Anywhere in which any group of people suffers from any kind of discrimination is a place that is weaker than it could be.

There is no harm in being aware of difference - and perhaps even intrigued by it - but we must most certainly fight against any intolerance of difference, of whatever kind. Accept the different...you will be doing your town, city, country, a lot of good by doing so.

In the meantime, however, if you are Asian, I would recommend steering clear of Russia, for the time being.

(If you would like to learn more of Ainan Celeste Cawley, a scientific child prodigy, aged eight years and seven months, or his gifted brothers, Fintan, five years exactly, and Tiarnan, twenty-eight months, please go to:http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2006/10/scientific-child-prodigy-guide.html I also write of gifted education, IQ, intelligence, the Irish, the Malays, Singapore, College, University, Chemistry, Science, genetics, left-handedness, precocity, child prodigy, child genius, baby genius, adult genius, savant, wunderkind, wonderkind, genio, гений ребенок prodigy, genie, μεγαλοφυία θαύμα παιδιών, bambino, kind.

We are the founders of Genghis Can, a copywriting, editing and proofreading agency, that handles all kinds of work, including technical and scientific material. If you need such services, or know someone who does, please go to: http://www.genghiscan.com/ Thanks.

This blog is copyright Valentine Cawley. Unauthorized duplication prohibited. Use Only with Permission. Thank you.)

Does Singapore value diversity?

Singapore considers itself a multiracial society - and, to a degree, this is true. There are Chinese, Malay and Indian Singaporeans - and a smidgeon of others. So small is that smidgeon that the first three groups account for almost everyone. Therefore, although multiracial in the sense of being of more than one race, it is not as diverse as many Western cities - indeed, by the standards of, say, London, it is not diverse at all.

Yet, it considers itself multiracial. It also considers itself well "integrated" - with the three races co-existing relatively harmoniously. However, there is something which is very clear when one reads the local newspapers: the word, "foreigner" appears an awful lot. There is a common concern here about the presence of foreigners. The underlying worry appears to be about competition: that the "foreigners" will somehow take their jobs, or even partners away from them. It is very strange, in a way, for without these "foreigners" that are written of, so often, Singapore would not be the successful city-state that it is. Many of these foreigners are of a high-calibre and occupy senior positions in many organizations. They are brought in precisely because they can add to the local economy in a very real sense. From the way the articles are written, however, it is clear that not everyone appreciates their presence.

A recent series of articles is a case in point. The issue of how many foreign students were admitted annually into Singapore's Universities was raised in Parliament, here. The motive for raising it seemed to be backed by the view that there are far too many of them - and that it should be controlled. One got the impression that those who raised the issue would rather that there weren't any foreign students at all.

The ostensible grounds for putting the question to Parliament, was a concern that the foreign students were depriving Singaporeans of University places and would crowd out the locals from achieving a tertiary education.

It transpired that over 4,000 foreign students a year, were admitted to Singaporean Universities, set against the over 20,000 places, per year, in those Universities (as far as I can recall). Thus, foreigners made up one in five student places, here.

Apparently, many Singaporeans thought this was rather too many. When they consider the situation, they see 4,000 places that could have gone to Singaporeans. What they don't see is 4,000 diverse individuals from all the world, bringing an intellectual freshness and vitality to Singaporean Universities that they would otherwise lack.

Many people here simply don't understand the richness that arrives on their shores, in the shape of foreign visitors, whether they be workers, students or tourists. It is these visitors who bring new perpectives and understandings to Singapore. Without them, this city would be much the lesser. Without the freshness they bring, this island would not be the prosperous place it is.

The common man, here, frequently does not see or understand this issue. They don't realize that without diversity and the influx of ideas and understandings that it brings, Singapore would be much the lesser, in every way.

I look at the statistic of one in five University students being from elsewhere - and think: too few. Many here see the same number and think: too many.

Foreigners can read newspapers, too. No doubt many of those 4,000 foreign University students are now aware that they are not truly welcomed by many here. I wonder how many fewer will subsequently choose to settle here, and make Singapore their home?

(If you would like to read of Ainan Celeste Cawley, a scientific child prodigy, aged seven years and eight months, and his gifted brothers, Fintan, four years and one month, or Tiarnan, eighteen months, please go to: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2006/10/scientific-child-prodigy-guide.html I also write of gifted education, IQ, intelligence, child prodigy, child genius, baby genius, adult genius, savant, the creatively gifted, gifted adults and gifted children in general. Thanks.)