Google
 
Web www.scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com

The boy who knew too much: a child prodigy

This is the true story of scientific child prodigy, and former baby genius, Ainan Celeste Cawley, written by his father. It is the true story, too, of his gifted brothers and of all the Cawley family. I write also of child prodigy and genius in general: what it is, and how it is so often neglected in the modern world. As a society, we so often fail those we should most hope to see succeed: our gifted children and the gifted adults they become. Site Copyright: Valentine Cawley, 2006 +

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Big Brother and Singaporean "Medicine".

Singapore is generally known as a "police state", to the rest of the world. In one way, this is an odd description, because one rarely sees actual policemen and women in Singapore. However, what people are referring to, when they label Singapore as a "police state" is, partially, the degree of surveillance of the citizens and the very controlled nature of the populace.

Now, nothing that I have written in the first paragraph is in the least controversial. This way of looking at Singapore is basically the common stereotype of the nation itself, in the eyes of the rest of the developed world. However, today I met with a very surprising aspect of this tendency towards surveillance and control.

I was in a Polyclinic with one of my sons, when I noted a weighing machine. Now, not having weighed myself in a good six months (thus, not being particularly interested in it), I thought that I might as well see how I was faring. So, I stepped onto the rather oddly shaped weighing machine. I saw it was odd because it had a column stretching up into the air above me, in addition to the weighing panel below me.

I rather expected to see a digital readout of my weight at that point. Indeed, I thought it would give me my body mass index too (since that was advertised on the machine). However, it gave me something else, something really disturbing, in my view. It asked me to scan my NRIC (national identity) card. That really spooked me. You see this machine, sitting quietly on its own in a Polyclinic, was actually spying for the state of Singapore. This is because anyone who actually weighed themselves with it, would have to identify themselves first. The machine would then weigh them. The tall column above the person, had a sensor at the top which, presumably, measured their height. These two pieces of information would then be used to calculate the BMI - or body mass index. This index is a measure of whether or not someone is "obese" and therefore open to various disease risks.

The machine itself is a good idea - however, the manner in which it had been implemented in Singapore struck me as a very bad one. By requiring all who used to it, to prove their identity, the machine could be used to gather data on individuals in Singapore, which should be private, really. Why would the machine ask for ID? The only possible reason is that the information is being stored against the person's name. If the information were not being stored, it would be a waste of time to ask for ID. It would make no sense. Yet, it seems to me a basic breach of individual privacy, that someone could not measure their BMI, in a Singaporean Polyclinic, without simultaneously having that information recorded for the attention of persons unknown. It should be at the discretion of the individual whether or not that information is made known to the state. They should have the power to decide the limits of knowledge of the state about themselves. After all, the state does not OWN the individual...or does it? The answer to that, for all other countries that I am familiar with is "no" - but with Singapore, one is left to wonder. Why have a machine to determine BMI that takes away from people the right to determine who knows that information about them? Is that reasonable?

Today, is a special day, in a way. It marks the first time, in my life, that I have seen a piece of medical equipment that demands ID from a person before it can be used. It is the first time in my life, that I have seen a piece of medical equipment that seems to automatically gather data about the population at the individual level.

George Orwell, the writer of "1984", would have recognized the weighing machine as the kind of device that would be common in his envisioned world. His was a world of total surveillance, in which even the tv in people's homes was a spying device that looked out into the rooms of every home in the land. A weighing machine that gathers data about the people who use it, is the very same kind of device. The spirit of the machines is akin.

In my title I have enclosed medicine in inverted commas. There is a good reason for this. You see, to my mind, medicine is about serving the patient's needs: the patient is centre of the whole edifice and the doctor, the hospital and all its staff and resources are there to meet his or her medical needs. Yet, that odd weighing machine doesn't fit into such a schema. A weighing machine that gathers data automatically about the people who use it, seems to be serving a different master, than a medical one. It takes control of the medical experience away from the patient. It creates a situation of involuntary submission of personal information. It seems, in fact, to serve the needs of a state to monitor its people - in this case, most invasively. A machine that automatically monitors the BMI of the population that uses it, is a machine that did not get permission from the patient, for a record to be made. It is a machine that takes personal freedom away from the patient. It subverts the innocent quest for a measurement of one's own weight and turns it into an invasion of privacy. It makes of it, yet another instance of the interests of the state, being placed above those of the individual.

Anyway, I didn't weigh myself. I didn't identify myself to this robotic "policeman". I stepped off the machine WITHOUT my BMI. You see, I wasn't about to submit a record of what I regard as private information, into some state electronic archive, by proceeding to weigh myself. As far as I am concerned, my BMI is a private matter for my attention alone.

Thus, it can be seen that the advent of medical machines that automatically record information leads immediately to a sharp reduction in care. Some people will choose NOT to use the machines and not learn more about their health, if that information is going to be archived. They will lose out on personal medical knowledge, because they will be seeking to ensure that no strangers have access to that information.

People should have the choice whether their medical data is recorded in databases. If they don't, some people will just avoid medical "care".

This unorthodox weighing machine is a step in a dangerous direction. The philosophy behind it is one that disregards the wishes of the patient. It doesn't ask the patient how they feel or what they want. It takes freedom and choice away from the individual. Each step in this direction, should be resisted - for the ultimate destination of such steps, is the total loss of personal freedom, choice and liberty. The road on which this machine stands goes to a place in which the state owns the individual - and treats the individual as property to be used as it wishes. Is that a road that Singapore should be travelling upon?

I suggest this. Reprogram the weighing machines. Take out the requirement for personal ID - and let them be what they should be: machines providing a private service, to allow a person to make a private assessment of their own health parameters - without forcing them to divulge it to anyone who cares to know. That is what medical "care" should be about: the patient, not the state.

P.S: For those who doubt my account of the Weighing Machine that Spies...please try this link:

http://www.avamech.com/B1000EC.htm

The machine I saw was by Avamech...and was very like this one. Note that it automatically transmits data to a computer - and that it captures identity for "database integration".

Unsurprisingly, Avalanche Mechtronics (hence Avamech...) is a Singaporean company. Perhaps only a company imbued with a worldview like Singapore's would manufacture a machine that takes a basic right to privacy away from its users.

(If you would like to learn more of Ainan Celeste Cawley, a scientific child prodigy, aged eight years and seven months, or his gifted brothers, Fintan, five years exactly, and Tiarnan, twenty-eight months, please go to:http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2006/10/scientific-child-prodigy-guide.html I also write of gifted education, IQ, intelligence, the Irish, the Malays, Singapore, College, University, Chemistry, Science, genetics, left-handedness, precocity, child prodigy, child genius, baby genius, adult genius, savant, wunderkind, wonderkind, genio, гений ребенок prodigy, genie, μεγαλοφυία θαύμα παιδιών, bambino, kind.

We are the founders of Genghis Can, a copywriting, editing and proofreading agency, that handles all kinds of work, including technical and scientific material. If you need such services, or know someone who does, please go to: http://www.genghiscan.com/ Thanks.

IMDB is the Internet Movie Database for film and tv professionals. If you would like to look at my IMDb listing for which another fifteen credits are to be uploaded, (which will probably take several months before they are accepted) please go to: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3438598/ As I write, the listing is new and brief - however, by the time you read this it might have a dozen or a score of credits...so please do take a look. My son, Ainan Celeste Cawley, also has an IMDb listing. His is found at: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3305973/ My wife, Syahidah Osman Cawley, has a listing as well. Hers is found at: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3463926/

This blog is copyright Valentine Cawley. Unauthorized duplication prohibited. Use Only with Permission. Thank you.)

Labels: , , ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
posted by Valentine Cawley @ 10:05 PM  0 comments

Friday, June 13, 2008

No freedom to play

Everyone likes to unwind - especially those whose jobs might be called, at best, unenviable.

Bangladeshi workers, in Singapore, are imported in their thousands to do the jobs that Singaporeans would never lower themselves to do. In return, these foreign workers get paid wages that would not be able to support them, in Singapore, were they not otherwise fed and housed. Indeed, their wages would not be able to support them in almost every country of the world.

Yet, people, everywhere, find resourceful ways to relax, in whatever free time they have - and make life more enjoyable. My wife tells me of a group of Bangladeshi workers that she heard about, who used to gather at the weekend, and play football in an open field, of no seeming use. Every weekend, they would enjoy this respite from their hard working lives: it was the highlight of their week. Until, one day, someone from officialdom came to them. They were told that they were not allowed to play football simply anywhere. They would have to pay. Football could not proceed until the proper fees had been paid. Indeed, they would have to secure a proper referee for their games - and he would have to receive a fee.

Now, these are Bangladeshi foreign workers on slave wages. They do not earn enough to be unconcerned about the cost of a referee. Suddenly, their weekly highlight was no more. They could no longer play football together - for they could not, in all reasonableness, pay what was demanded of them.

I was shocked by this. The lives of these workers are bad enough without taking away their primary means of leisure. Is it not enough that they are being exploited, by being paid far less than what a person doing a job like theirs is typically paid, worldwide? Construction work, and the like is WELL-PAID in most developed countries. In Singapore, it is most certainly not so, despite the rigours and dangers. At the very least, allow them to enjoy a game of football, to unwind: it is not much to ask.

I am puzzled that some Singaporeans think it is their place to interfere so much in the simple course of other peoples' lives. There is no harm in a game of football played between friends. It is most certainly not something to be regulated and controlled - and forced to pay fees (for which read "football tax"). A game of football is a natural pastime between young sporting men. No-one should attempt to interfere in that: to do so, is to delimit the lives of others for no other reason than that one wishes to delimit the lives of others.

I do not know on what basis the obvious attempt to stop the Bangladeshis playing football was made. If it is just an instance of a rule being made up specifically to thwart the Bangladeshis, then one has concerns of racist intent. If, on the other hand, it is, in fact, a general rule, applying to ALL games of football for which permission has not been applied, and fees not paid, then I am even more concerned. The playing of football is not a matter for official interference. Any rule which prevents the natural sporting play between informal groups of friends, is a rule that will stifle the development of a sporting culture. It should be stopped, at once.

A Bangladeshi worker has as much right to enjoy life, as a Singaporean banker, lawyer, or Minister. They should be left in peace to do so.

(If you would like to learn more of Ainan Celeste Cawley, a scientific child prodigy, aged eight years and five months, or his gifted brothers, Fintan, four years and ten months, and Tiarnan, twenty-seven months, please go to: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2006/10/scientific-child-prodigy-guide.html I also write of gifted education, IQ, intelligence, the Irish, the Malays, Singapore, College, University, Chemistry, Science, genetics, left-handedness, precocity, child prodigy, child genius, baby genius, adult genius, savant, wunderkind, wonderkind, genio, гений ребенок prodigy, genie, μεγαλοφυία θαύμα παιδιών, bambino, kind

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
posted by Valentine Cawley @ 12:13 AM  1 comments

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape