Blaer is the chosen name of a 15 year old
girl in Iceland. It is the name her mother chose for her. Yet, in Iceland, this
name has been forbidden because it is not on the official list of permissible
names. Young Blaer is now having to sue her own government for the right to be
called by her own name.
This might seem like a minor matter, but I
find this case very unsettling. It seems to me that a government has no place
interfering in the expressive choices of parents and children alike, when it
comes to their own names. In Iceland, not even grown adults are allowed to
choose names for themselves outside of the official list. This smacks of a kind
of repression George Orwell would have remarked upon, had he known about it.
The right to self-expression, as long as it
does not harm others, should be basic to all peoples everywhere – without exception.
A government attempting to curtail and control the expressive choices of its
people, is a government that has gotten out of control. If I were Blaer I would
do something very direct to protest this matter, when I grew up: I would
emigrate and make the reason for emigration into a news story, internationally –
for that would assuredly embarrass this daft little government.
Apparently, Germany and Denmark also
restrict name choices. Again, I see no justification for doing this. The reason
given is that it prevents parents naming children with embarrassing names. That
seems a rather slight justification since if a child has been given a silly
name – that child should then be able to change it, later in life, to something
more acceptable to them. At no point, is there any justification for the
curtailment of expression, by these arguments.
When my wife and I came to choose the names
of our children, we chose each with great care. Though others will not know it
and we are not going to inform them, each of our children’s names has a
personal and a universal meaning. They are literally little stories or descriptive
phrases that we have related to each of our children, for personal reasons.
They follow a unique schema and consist of a mixture of Gaelic, Arabic, and
Latinate names, that has no duplicates, anywhere, on Earth. The names are
absolutely unique (though many people now insist on pretending to be one of our
children, online...they are not him). Had we been Icelandic, German or Danish,
we would not have been granted this freedom. We would have had to select a name
common to many others, one without the unique meaning we have written into the
names of our children. That strikes me as wrong. The right to express oneself,
one’s views, one’s beliefs, ones thoughts, and feelings is absolutely
fundamental to the basic freedoms all humans should enjoy everywhere. Those
three countries are disallowing those freedoms to their citizens. This is a
denial of what I view to be a basic human right.
I do not know if we shall have any more
children – but if we do, the names of those children shall tell a tale like no
other. They will bear a name that no-one before them has ever borne. Those
names shall be created just for them – and that is how it should be. All
parents should have the right to name their children, in whatever way they
please. If some names cause others offence, then that is an acceptable price to
pay for the preservation of a basic freedom of expression.
It seems to me that Iceland, Germany and
Denmark have something to learn about the value of self-expression for society.
I wonder what other freedoms of expression they control, by means direct and
indirect? If you know, please write below.
Posted by Valentine Cawley
(If you would like to support my continued writing of this blog and my ongoing campaign to raise awareness about giftedness and all issues pertaining to it, please donate, by clicking on the gold button to the left of the page.
To read about my fundraising campaign, please go to: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2011/01/fundraising-drive-in-support-of-my.html and here: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2011/01/fundraising-drive-first-donation.html
If you would like to read any of our scientific research papers, there are links to some of them, here: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2011/02/research-papers-by-valentine-cawley-and.html
If you would like to see an online summary of my academic achievements to date, please go here: http://www.getcited.org/mbrz/11136175To learn more of Ainan Celeste Cawley, 10, or his gifted brothers, Fintan, 7 and Tiarnan, 5, please go to: http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2006/10/scientific-child-prodigy-guide.html
I also write of gifted education, child prodigy, child genius, adult genius, savant, megasavant, HELP University College, the Irish, the Malays, Singapore, Malaysia, IQ, intelligence and creativity.
There is a review of my blog, on the respected The Kindle Report here:http://thekindlereport.blogspot.com/2010/09/boy-who-knew-too-much-child-prodigy.html
Please have a read, if you would like a critic's view of this blog. Thanks.
You can get my blog on your Kindle, for easy reading, wherever you are, by going to: http://www.amazon.com/Boy-Who-Knew-Too-Much/dp/B0042P5LEE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&m=AG56TWVU5XWC2&s=digital-text&qid=1284603792&sr=8-1
Please let all your fellow Kindlers know about my blog availability - and if you know my blog well enough, please be so kind as to write a thoughtful review of what you like about it. Thanks.
My Internet Movie Database listing is at:http://imdb.com/name/nm3438598/
Ainan's IMDB listing is at http://imdb.com/name/nm3305973/
Syahidah's IMDB listing is at http://imdb.com/name/nm3463926/
Our editing, proofreading and copywriting company, Genghis Can, is athttp://www.genghiscan.com/This blog is copyright Valentine Cawley. Unauthorized duplication is prohibited. Use only with permission. Thank you.)
Labels: Blaer, creativity, dictatorial governing styles, freedom of expression, Iceland, Icelandic naming, reasons to emigrate, restrictions of personal freedoms, suing the government
2 Comments:
I would think that the rule is justified. Even though a child could change their name at later stage in life if a silly name is given (don't underestimate the stupidity of humans), they would have already lived many years with irreparable psychological harm.
The way I see it is that, it is a small inconvenience and price to pay to protect small children. Or are people too self centered to protect the helpless minority?
Yes, I agree that there could be more flexibility or recourse other than legal one in order to use a name that is sensible but outside the list of permissible name. But until someone can think of an idea which is cheap and straightforward to implement. I go with protecting minority children.
I understand your sentiment, but you fail to consider the fact that of the worlds millions of names, the vast majority would be unobjectionable. So, what the Danes/Icelandic and Germans have done is reduce the possible legal name set to in the Icelandic case about 1700 names for girls and about 2000 for boys (or vice versa, I can't recall which way around it was). This means that they have banned MILLIONS of potential names - to stop the abuse of a very small minority. It is a bit of an overkill. What they could have done instead is allow ALL names, but then have a review process to reverse the naming of kids like "Serial Killer" or "Satan" Or "Uglyface" and so on. Objectionable names could be removed later, rather than preventing the use of millions of perfectly decent names.
Had there been a similar rule in South East Asia I am sure that none of my children could have been named as they are - because their names use words from many parts of the world. Sad.
Post a Comment
<< Home