Google
 
Web www.scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com

The boy who knew too much: a child prodigy

This is the true story of scientific child prodigy, and former baby genius, Ainan Celeste Cawley, written by his father. It is the true story, too, of his gifted brothers and of all the Cawley family. I write also of child prodigy and genius in general: what it is, and how it is so often neglected in the modern world. As a society, we so often fail those we should most hope to see succeed: our gifted children and the gifted adults they become. Site Copyright: Valentine Cawley, 2006 +

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

A state of madness.

Akmal Shaikh has been executed, or should I say, assassinated, by China. His crime was to be delusional. His punishment was death.

The whole developed world pleaded with China to stay his execution and commute his sentence...but China, in its pig-headed way, ignored them. In China, the opinion of the whole world, has no value at all. Despite every effort of the rest of the world, China killed him, by lethal injection.

Now, as you will probably know, Akmal Shaikh was caught carrying drugs he didn't know he was bearing, whilst under the incredible delusion that he was flying to China to record a hit single, that would "bring world peace". Now, if that isn't reason enough to reconsider his sentence and commute it, perhaps to a stay in a mental hospital, I don't know what is.

For me, the most appalling element of this is the self-serving nonsense spewing from China. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Jiang Yu, said, for instance, that Akmal Shaikh's rights had been "fully protected". Yep. I can see how killing a man for something he didn't intentionally do, is "protecting his rights". Perhaps Mr. Jiang Yu would also like to be executed for something he didn't willingly do...and then he, too, can enjoy the full protection of his rights. The same astonishing spokesman went on to say, in classic paranoid delusional fashion: "We hope the British side will face this case squarely and not create new obstacles for China-Britain relations". I say this is paranoid because it is a classic sign of this illness that someone should blame others for their own actions. Here, China is blaming Britain for the consequence of its own actions - killing a most certainly innocent man.

China is growing economically. However, in many ways, it remains a backward, even barbaric country. It does not heed international norms for human rights. It does not listen to international opinion. It has a history of appalling crimes against its own people (take one look at Tianamen Square...). Yet, the world is expected, by China, to show it respect in proportion to its economic success. However, what China fails to understand is that economic might, alone, does not command any respect at all. Just as one would not respect a rich man whose path to richness involved crimes against others, disrepect for basic human rights, and general disregard for the rest of the world. So, too, does China not command respect at this time - for it's behaviour is too coarse, too callous, too cold by international standards.

I hope that China matures as a nation - that it develops a sophisticated, humane, concerned and involved personality that takes heed of global standards for national conduct. For, at this time, China is far from being such a welcome global citizen. Its standards of conduct are well below what it expected from even the most backward of countries.

China has done well economically, it is now time for them to take a good look at themselves and focus on becoming a humane nation.

(If you would like to learn more of Ainan Celeste Cawley, a scientific child prodigy, aged eight years and seven months, or his gifted brothers, Fintan, five years exactly, and Tiarnan, twenty-eight months, please go to:http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2006/10/scientific-child-prodigy-guide.html I also write of gifted education, IQ, intelligence, the Irish, the Malays, Singapore, College, University, Chemistry, Science, genetics, left-handedness, precocity, child prodigy, child genius, baby genius, adult genius, savant, wunderkind, wonderkind, genio, гений ребенок prodigy, genie, μεγαλοφυία θαύμα παιδιών, bambino, kind.

We are the founders of Genghis Can, a copywriting, editing and proofreading agency, that handles all kinds of work, including technical and scientific material. If you need such services, or know someone who does, please go to: http://www.genghiscan.com/ Thanks.

IMDB is the Internet Movie Database for film and tv professionals. If you would like to look at my IMDb listing for which another fifteen credits are to be uploaded, (which will probably take several months before they are accepted) please go to: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3438598/ As I write, the listing is new and brief - however, by the time you read this it might have a dozen or a score of credits...so please do take a look. My son, Ainan Celeste Cawley, also has an IMDb listing. His is found at: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3305973/ My wife, Syahidah Osman Cawley, has a listing as well. Hers is found at: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3463926/

This blog is copyright Valentine Cawley. Unauthorized duplication prohibited. Use Only with Permission. Thank you.)

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
posted by Valentine Cawley @ 11:56 AM  10 comments

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno's challenge.

Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno is a 32 year old Malaysian Muslim part time model. She is also the first woman to be sentenced to be caned under Malaysia's sharia law - in her case, for drinking alcohol at a hotel nightclub. She is due to receive 6 lashes.



Now, her case is a very interesting one for it seems to me that Malaysia has a lot more to lose from this case, than Kartika does. Kartika would suffer pain, from her caning yes...but Malaysia will lose a lot more: its international standing.



It seems that Kartika is very well aware of this. She has already challenged the authorities to cane her in public. I think this is a strategy to make Malaysians, and people the world over, aware of the realities of what this caning punishment involves. A public caning would really bring home to them just how barbaric this procedure is. The authorities, of course, have refused her request.



The Prime Minister Najib Razak has urged Kartika to appeal her sentence, saying that she should not accept it so willingly. He is seemingly concerned about the overseas effects should this punishment go ahead. Kartika, on the other hand, and very revealingly has said, in response: "I won't file any appeal. Carry on and cane me. Don't waste my time." These words lend themselves to three interpretations. Kartika could be so certain of the rigidity and inflexibility of the religious legal authorities in Malaysia, that she is sure the caning will go ahead, no matter how she appeals. Thus, "Don't waste my time." Alternatively, she could feel that she deserves the punishment, having bought into the sharia position on her drinking. Finally, it could be that she understands, very well indeed, that it is Malaysia that will lose most, in this situation. She could, therefore, be punishing her country, by simply going ahead and being caned. The effect on Kartika will, most probably, be temporary...sharp pain, bruising, but probably not scarring since a lighter rod is used for women, than men and the beating is not meant to break the skin. Kartika will, therefore, recover in a few weeks. However, Malaysia will not recover from this punishment. It will henceforth be seen as a barbaric state not in tune with modern thinking on crime and punishment. It will lose its cherished status as a "moderate" Muslim nation.



These are difficult matters. Whatever one thinks of sharia law, it is Malaysia's right to abide by such law, if it so wishes. All nations should be free to choose their own path. However, and this is a big, "however", the world is now very interrelated. Nothing that is now done, goes without an effect on the wider world. Most of the rest of the world does NOT abide by sharia law. Most of the rest of the world does NOT understand it. Most of the rest of the world considers its punishments frequently too excessive for the "crimes" being punished. I have placed "crimes" in inverted commas because many of sharia's "crimes" are not even considered crimes in most of the rest of the world. They are, in fact, normal behaviours in most of the rest of the world. Thus, following sharia law places a nation in the difficult position of being at odds with the majority thinking in the world, on crime and punishment. Indeed, by comparison, certain sharia punishments are seen as barbaric by the outer world. This does not place a nation in a good international position. If a nation comes to be seen as barbaric, it might lose trading partners. Furthermore, people may be reluctant to do business there, not being comfortable with the legal climate in the nation. Foreigners may choose not to relocate to the nation in question, to live and work there and so on. The repercussions of a barbaric reputation are endless - and all detrimental.



Any Muslim nation has a difficult balancing act to make. They must balance their adherence to Muslim law and thinking, with their need to survive and prosper in the wider world. The leaders of all nations need to understand and pay heed to the fact that other nations will judge them by their own standards - and that those standards will differ. However, there is also the majority opinion to be considered: what would most nations think of a particular law, action or punishment? In the case of the caning of Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno for simply drinking in a night club, almost all nations on Earth would consider that punishment excessive and, dare I say it, barbaric. So, Malaysia must consider its actions with regards to Kartika in the light of the majority opinion of the world, with respect to her punishment. There is a lot more at stake here than seeing that a young woman is properly punished for her transgression of a local law. There is the very standing of the nation in question.



In essence, by being part of an international community, all nations have to pay heed to the standards, in all things, deemed acceptable by that community. There is, in some sense, a giving up, to a degree, of the complete freedom of choice to do whatever it pleases, of a nation. Being part of a community means that those choices are moderated, by how the other parties will perceive the nation that so acts.



Malaysia may wish to stick to the letter of sharia law, whatever the price it pays internationally for doing so. That is up to Malaysia. However, its decision should be made in the light of two considerations: applying sharia law in such a way as to cane a young woman, for a "crime" that is not considered a crime at all, almost everywhere on Earth, is going to cause grave damage to Malaysia's international reputation. Yet, moderating her punishment, so that it does not involve physical punishment, would show that Malaysia is willing to integrate itself with the international community and open itself up to the myriad benefits that come with that.



Kartika's challenge to Malaysia is basically a simple and very powerful one: show the world who you are...barbarians or a civilized society.

It is an odd situation. You see if Kartika IS caned, then she will have WON, for Malaysia will be far the greater loser in that situation. Malaysia will suffer far greater, long-term pain, than Kartika. Interestingly, I think both parties know it, now. Kartika's case has been placed under review - even though she did not seek a review. It seems that Malaysia is trying to find a way to save itself from a self-inflicted wound. We will have to wait and see what is decided.

(I would like to make it clear that, in this piece, I am not criticizing sharia law, at all. I am just pointing out that the international standards of punishment for the same "crimes" differ greatly and, in many instances, the international community considers sharia punishments excessive. Thus, what I am discussing is the differing views on the same issues that must be reconciled. I should also point out that I am a non-drinker, myself!)

(If you would like to learn more of Ainan Celeste Cawley, a scientific child prodigy, aged eight years and seven months, or his gifted brothers, Fintan, five years exactly, and Tiarnan, twenty-eight months, please go to:http://scientific-child-prodigy.blogspot.com/2006/10/scientific-child-prodigy-guide.html I also write of gifted education, IQ, intelligence, the Irish, the Malays, Singapore, College, University, Chemistry, Science, genetics, left-handedness, precocity, child prodigy, child genius, baby genius, adult genius, savant, wunderkind, wonderkind, genio, гений ребенок prodigy, genie, μεγαλοφυία θαύμα παιδιών, bambino, kind.

We are the founders of Genghis Can, a copywriting, editing and proofreading agency, that handles all kinds of work, including technical and scientific material. If you need such services, or know someone who does, please go to: http://www.genghiscan.com/ Thanks.

IMDB is the Internet Movie Database for film and tv professionals.If you would like to look at my IMDb listing for which another fifteen credits are to be uploaded, (which will probably take several months before they are accepted) please go to: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3438598/ As I write, the listing is new and brief - however, by the time you read this it might have a dozen or a score of credits...so please do take a look. My son, Ainan Celeste Cawley, also has an IMDb listing. His is found at: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3305973/ My wife, Syahidah Osman Cawley, has a listing as well. Hers is found at: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3463926/

This blog is copyright Valentine Cawley. Unauthorized duplication prohibited. Use Only with Permission. Thank you.)

Labels: , , , , , , ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
posted by Valentine Cawley @ 7:25 PM  3 comments

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape